This article provides guidance to buyers on how to submit relevant evidence when filing a dispute. Providing clear, specific, and well-documented evidence significantly improves the likelihood of a favourable resolution.
Each dispute category may require different types of documentation. The evidence outlined below is intended as general guidance only. Depending on the specific circumstances, additional or alternative documentation may be required or recommended.
All submissions should include objective, timestamped, and verifiable records that clearly support the claim and can be easily understood by a neutral third-party reviewer.
Standard evidence guidelines for buyers
Dispute reason |
Recommended evidence |
|
Item not delivered You did not receive the product or service. |
If the order not marked as delivered yet: No evidence is required from you, however any communication attempt with the seller about the late delivery may help. ************************** If the order is marked as delivered, but you did not receive it: Shipped items
Non-shipped physical items
Digital items
Services
|
|
Technical Issue Preventing Access or Use (Digital Products) You received the digital item, but you cannot access or use it due to a technical issue or defect. |
|
|
Item Not as Described You received the product or service, but not as it was advertised by, or agreed with, the seller. |
1/ Evidence that the item was incorrectly advertised by the seller:
2/ Evidence that the item received does not match the listing or agreement: Physical items
Digital assets
Digital and in-person services
If partial service was delivered, clearly explain which parts were not completed, how it impacted you, and whether you benefited from the delivered portion. |
Evidence submission standards (applies to all disputes)
To ensure clarity and fairness during the review process:
Submit only documentation that is directly relevant to your claim.
Ensure screenshots are clear, complete, and easy to read.
Include visible dates and timestamps wherever possible.
Highlight key details when helpful to guide the reviewer.
Avoid internal terms or platform-specific language that an external reviewer may not understand.
Provide brief explanations where necessary to give proper context.
Trustap’s dispute decisions are based solely on the information directly available and the evidence provided. Your submission should therefore be complete, clear, and able to stand on its own without additional clarification.
Conclusion
The evidence categories outlined above serve as general guidance to help buyers prepare and structure their dispute submissions. Depending on the specific circumstances and complexity of the case, additional or alternative documentation may be required.
The most effective dispute submissions are factual, well-organised, and directly aligned with the original claim. Providing clear, relevant, timestamped, and verifiable evidence helps minimise delays and supports a fair and efficient resolution process.
Need Help?
Respond to your existing support ticket with your questions, or contact our Support Team here.
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.